The Rapid Response Institute

Tag: operations

  • Fake Science

    Fake Science

    “I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned.” – Richard Feynman

    “I am the science.”  You have got to be kidding me Mr. Fauci.  Clearly, you have no training in the Scientific Method or maybe your just plan arrogant.  Home many lives have you and you colleagues destroyed, you fake scientist?

    As an actual degreed physicist, I have published here and other media on the process ‘real’ scientists take to address new phenomena.  Yet a singular medical doctor, not a degreed scientist claims the godlike mantel of ‘I am science?’

    Welcome to 21st Century quackery.  In his testimony before Congress, “Dr. Fauci reaffirmed shocking testimony that the ‘six feet apart’ social distancing recommendation that he promoted was arbitrary, not based on science, and ‘sort of just appeared.’”  Science?  NOT!!  Do I hear leaches and blood letting are next?

    Trillions and Trillions and Trillions

    Untold lives and treasure has been destroyed by the Covid-19 quacks.  Not just MD types but a complacent media and hapless governments (politicians as well as regulators) at all levels.

    I am not a Covid denier.  Yes, many got sick and too many died, but we are now learning is that a so call ‘medical’ approach to this problem was based on NOTHING real!  Moreover, it appears that senior officials at the  National Health Institute knowingly lied to us repeatedly.

    Let me see if I understand this, a US funded research institute focused on ‘gain of function‘ released the Covid or it came from a bat?  Readers can make their own decision.

    Pockets were padded and many had their (more) than fifteen minutes of fame.  What did the rest of us get? Lost jobs, closed (forever) small businesses, and now ‘oh joy’ inflation due to government largess.

    The National Institute of Health appears to have put in place a systematic procedure to foil Freedom of Information Act requests.   Our right to know and have oversight that limits the ability of dictatorships to emerge was compromised.

    The arrogance and disgust which these so called public service hold us, the public is beyond the pail.  But not to worry they are all multimillionaires working on GS 15 (~ $180,000) salaries.  They must get great investment advice.

    The old saying about reality is applicable, “If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it just may be a duck.”  Or it may be a MD policy wonk from the government that is ‘here to help or destroy your life.’  Remember how those who questioned the conventional wisdom were treated/abused?

    Bring in the mandatory masks.  No less than the conservative (lol) AL JAZEERA reports that key Covid players now question the value of masks we were all forced to wear.  Fascism!

    What the world was put through for years by dictatorial medical types and the fake media that took down other opinions and approaches is appalling.  Jail time is too good for these liars as they got rich.  Next time they come up with the crap they should be run out of town as they have not earned any respect.

    Have you put your liar detector in place when the fake government arrives and says ‘we are here to help/mandate?’

    For More Information

    Please note, RRI does not endorse or advocate the links to any third-party materials herein.  They are provided for education and entertainment only.

    See our Economic Value Proposition Matrix® (EVPM) for additional information and a free version to build your own EVPM.

    The author’s credentials in this field are available on his LinkedIn page.  Moreover, Dr. Shemwell is a coauthor of the just published book, “Smart Manufacturing: Integrating Transformational Technologies for Competitiveness and Sustainability.”  His focus is on Operational Technologies.

    “People fail to get along because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don’t know each other; they don’t know each other because they have not communicated with each other.” (Martin Luther King speech at Cornell College, 1962).  For more information on Cross Cultural Engagement, check out our Cross Cultural Serious Game.  You can contact this author as well.

    For more details regarding climate change models, check out Bjorn Lomborg ands his latest book, False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet.

    Regarding the economics of Climate Change, check out our blog, Crippling Green.

    For those start-up firms addressing energy (including renewables) challenges, the author can put you in touch with Global Energy Mentors which provide no-cost mentoring services from energy experts.  If interested, check it out and give me a shout.

  • Leaving the Military?

    Leaving the Military?

    Over 200,000 members of the US Armed Forces are discharged and return to civilian life ever year.  Some will have difficulties with this transition.

    In 1970 this military ‘brat’ graduated from North Georgia College (a military school) and served four years in the US Army.  In 1974, this business ‘clueless’ individual entered the civilian workforce.  With little or no support/help, I fumbled my way through my job search and ultimately through a ‘head hunter’ aka recruiter to a career in the oil and gas industry.

    This hunt and peck approach to finding a career need not be repeated these many years later.  Resources and experience/expertise is available for today’s veterans.

    We are happy to talk with any veteran wanting help with the transition to civilian life.  Contact us (leave a short message regarding your interests) and we will get back to you shortly.

    Contact Us

    The Ten

    These are some ‘starting’ points that may help you articulate your skill set to potential employers.  Answer these before you send your resume and certainly before an interview.

    1. How does your military experience such as leadership, teamwork, dealing with adversity and deadlines translate to civilian speak?  For example, if you were in combat, your success depended on all and more of the above traits and nothing you will do in civilian life is anywhere near as stressful or critical.  Don’t minimize this experience but focus on how it can add value to the organization.
    2. Assume interviewers have no understanding about how the military works.  Refrain from using military jargon such as weapon nomenclature, acronyms, etc.
    3. Many civilian prospects articulate the money made/saved as a series of successes.  For example, “Under my leadership we increased revenue by X.”  Consider reframing military missions along the lines of, “My team completed our tasks under budget and faster than any before.”
    4. If your skills are directly relatable such as Police, Medical, IT, aviation, maritime or other speak in the language of those cultures.
    5. Be yourself and if the situation warrants it, the interviewer may be comfortable with you using first name as opposed to Sir/Ma’am.  Let him/her be the lead on the formalities.
    6. Hide any tattoos, etc. if you can wearing long sleeve shirts/blouses etc.  Body art may not be widely accepted by some organizations.
    7. Do your homework!  Research the organization and decide why you want to work for them.  Same reason you joined the military, right?
    8. Your resume (hardcopy/online) is how the hiring managers will perceive you prior to an interview.  Learn to present yourself in terms they understand.
    9. Many civilian organizations are less structured than the military.  Prepare for a more laissez-faire attitude at work, even if your the boss.
    10. Many organizations, their culture and workforce can be very competitive.  Much more so than the generally collaborative military.

    There are many other differences in lifestyles and veterans need not be intimidated by them.

    It is the next and new chapter in your life so embrace it.

    For More Information

    Please note, RRI does not endorse or advocate the links to any third-party materials herein.  They are provided for education and entertainment only.

    See our Economic Value Proposition Matrix® (EVPM) for additional information and a free version to build your own EVPM.

    The author’s credentials in this field are available on his LinkedIn page.  Moreover, Dr. Shemwell is a coauthor of the just published book, “Smart Manufacturing: Integrating Transformational Technologies for Competitiveness and Sustainability.”  His focus is on Operational Technologies.

    “People fail to get along because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don’t know each other; they don’t know each other because they have not communicated with each other.” (Martin Luther King speech at Cornell College, 1962).  For more information on Cross Cultural Engagement, check out our Cross Cultural Serious Game.  You can contact this author as well.

    For more details regarding climate change models, check out Bjorn Lomborg ands his latest book, False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet.

    Regarding the economics of Climate Change, check out our recent blog, Crippling Green.

    For those start-up firms addressing energy (including renewables) challenges, the author can put you in touch with Global Energy Mentors which provide no-cost mentoring services from energy experts.  If interested, check it out and give me a shout.

  • Going Green? Or NOT!

    Going Green? Or NOT!

    The total or lifecycle carbon footprint for any energy source is a function of the manufacturing, commissioning, operation (including maintenance) and decommissioning of that asset.  Moreover, the value of an electric powered vehicles (EV) is seen as a function of the amount of fossil fuel no longer used by the vehicle.  However, this is only a sub-model of the to carbon footprint of any component in the Basket of (Energy) Goods, aka Energy Basket.

    All energy resources in the basket must be held to the same set of metrics.  These include Human Resources (including diversity and inclusion), Safety Culture, communities as well as the bottom line performance against governance standards (ESG).

    Risk Governance

    A governance framework that exceeds these standards follows.  Evolving over several decades, it reflects a comprehensive approach to operational risk that is often overlooked.  It addresses the entire life of a revenue producing asset.

    Lifecycle risk mitigation of an energy resource must include the end of the asset life processes.  What governance driven processes are in place to prevent the accumulation of wind turbine blades or spent solar panels stacked and abandoned?  Just like the tires stacked for decades.

    Turns out the answer is few.  Long life assets such as factories, skyscrapers, fossil fuel production systems, etc. are built to the engineering, industry and local regulatory standards of that day.  Ongoing operations, maintenance, upgrades and so forth keep them performing at acceptable levels.  However, governance models are often focused on the present.  End of asset life risk does not fit into the four quarter management mindset as the event may be sometime in the future.

    The above graphic represents a governance model built around operations and associated risks.  The archetype recognizes that many risk mitigation processes are inadequate for today’s complex organizations with multi-faceted global processes.

    Its framework is built upon the work done by the Treadwell Commission several decades ago to detect financial fraud.  This structure supports the extension into field operations and provides a structure for attaining and sustaining Operational Excellence.

    Risk mitigation is both quantitative and qualitative.  The risk associate with the use of any industrial energy source must be thoroughly assessed as a function of its lifecycle, not just its initial CAPEX and ongoing operations.

    Dumping v Decommissioning

    Illegal industrial dumping has long been a problem.  Today, some in the wind turbine sector appear to be following the decades long vehicle tire disposal process (or lack thereof).

    Lady Bird Johnson at least tried to hide the piles of tire debris but no one has found a way of completely dealing with this growing and massive problem.  As of 2017, some 17% were still disposed of in landfills.  In 2003, the EPA reports that almost 300 million tires are scraped each year.  Flash forward to today and this is likely a very conservative number.  That said, 17% equals approximately 50 million tires headed to landfills as opposed to recycling.

    Moreover, there is a long history of industrial dumping trash so as not to have to pay the disposal fees.  One wonders how many millions of tires destined for landfills (and other recycling) are just dumped?

    The decommissioning process is the responsible end-of-asset-life shutdown and removal.  The intent is to return the site to a condition similar to its initial environment and properly remove and dispose of equipment and materials.  It should not include stacking wind turbine blades next to a pile of discarded vehicle tires.

    Total Carbon Lifecycle Model

    Daily, we hear about the need to reduce carbon output to (net) zero.  Promises are made by many that by such and such a time this metric will be met.  Caveat: usually the time period is beyond the expected tenure of those making the statements.  Often lost in the discussion is the carbon cost of manufacturing and decommissioning.

    Carbon output should include the mineral extraction process, recycling of older materials if appropriate, transportation, manufacturing, installation, operations and decommissioning.  It also must include the carbon cost of the supply chain necessary to support the asset across its lifecycle.  For example, the carbon cost of an EV is not just the vehicle’s operation but the lifecycle of the vehicle as well as the electric power generation and distribution necessary to operate the automobile.  Do not forget the carbon cost of manufacturing a battery and disposing of it at end of life.

    Scrap

    Materials are often staged for recycling.  They feed a process that results in new useful product(s) that may add new value.  This is a useful recycling process that makes a lot of sense.  However, sometimes this is not as economical as new manufacturing.  These economics lead to dumping as the low-cost-solution.  Fields of discarded materials may or may not be awaiting recycling.

    Defining Green

    Being green is not simply using renewable electricity instead of gasoline.  If the carbon footprint is no different or even worse, then the problem is not solved and may even be made greater.

    Keep in mind that coal is still a major fuel in the generation of electricity.  According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2020 over 60% of power is generated using fossil fuels of which over 19% is from coal.  This does not include the carbon footprint of materials and products imported to the US.

    So if the carbon footprint of a wind turbine is defined as its lifecycle and if at the end result is abandonment in a field, is the green value of that product positive?  Or is it just dumping not unlike the pollution of a nation’s river systems?

    Being green is not just plugging in your car overnight.  Like most things in life, it is systemic.

    Is Your Organization’s Green Plan Systemic or Myopic?

    For More Information

    Please note, RRI does not endorse or advocate the links to any third-party materials.  They are provided for education and entertainment only.

    For more information on Cross Cultural Engagement, check out our Cross Cultural Serious Game

    We presented, Should Cross Cultural Serious Games Be Included in Your Diversity Program: Best Practices and Lessons Learned at the Online Conference, New Diversity Summit 2020 the week of September 14, 2020.  Check Out this timely event and contact the organizer for access to the presentations!!

    For more on DEI Standards, see the newly released ISO-30415.

    You can contact this author as well.

  • ESG Implementation–Strong v Weak Revisited

    ESG Implementation–Strong v Weak Revisited

    “A healthy corporation acts on the interests of its stakeholders and customers”

    — Ari Melber, Journalist

    Currently, organizations are being implored to implement Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) driven business models.   Proponents even suggest that investment in organizations that do not have this imprimatur should be avoided or even divested.

    However, one wonders what has changed?  Successful firms, private and public have long understood that they must add value to their constituencies.  One example, a few decades ago an energy services provider used its high volume oilfield pumps to help a small town in Kansas where it had a district office drain flood waters.  Why would they do this?  Perhaps because employees lived in this community or perhaps it was just the right thing to do.

    Flash forward and we find organizational largess still in place.  During the recent Texas freeze, a local furniture retailer opened its doors to dispossessed individuals and families.  The owner has a long record of supporting the community and his responses to local disasters is legendary.

    After the Deepwater Horizon incident in April 2010, our firm started to look at Asset Integrity issues in oilfield operations.  Our discoveries transcended several Critical Infrastructure segments.  The recent failure of the Colonial Pipeline is a manifestation of issues uncovered yet not resolved more than a decade ago!

    Focus on Operations

    In 2011, we posited that organizational governance was not just a financial issue at the ‘C’ level.  Rather its true focus should be at the revenue generating asset level.  This led to our 2011 groundbreaking monograph, Asset/Equipment Integrity Governance: Operations–Enterprise Alignment.  Therein, we posited a new governance model that incorporated the ESG components widely discussed today.

    Moreover, in 2014 our book, IMPLEMENTING A CULTURE of SAFETY: A ROADMAP FOR PERFORMANCE BASED COMPLIANCE identified the requirement for organizations in the Critical Infrastructure space to change governance models to one of Strong Bond.

    Following the release of our AIG model, we put forth a Strong v Weak governance model to manage High Reliability Organizations (HRO) necessary for firms in Critical Infrastructure sectors.  Strong Bond is appropriate for organizations in Critical Infrastructure segments, while Weak Bonds may be better for retail.

    One suspects that ESG is another tick in the box.  If ten years (or earlier) from now another critical system fails, it will not be because HRM processes were not followed or ESG verbiage was in the annual report Letter to Shareholders; it will be because nothing really changed.  As of this writing the US Federal government is advising organizations in Critical Infrastructure sectors to more aggressively address cybersecurity risks.

    Why is this? Do Boards and CEOs need politicians and bureaucrats to tell them about the details of running a business?  If they do, investors may want to revisit their portfolios.

    One suspects that the ESG fad will fade. There will always be a new management mantra that consultants will put forth.  Well run organizations will remain well run.  Others not so much.

    Governance models come and go.  Regardless, how will you assure your organization is well run?

    For More Information

    Please note, RRI does not endorse or advocate the links to any third-party materials.  They are provided for education and entertainment only.

    For more information on Cross Cultural Engagement, check out our Cross Cultural Serious Game

    We presented, Should Cross Cultural Serious Games Be Included in Your Diversity Program: Best Practices and Lessons Learned at the Online Conference, New Diversity Summit 2020 the week of September 14, 2020.  Check Out this timely event and contact the organizer for access to the presentations!!

    You can contact this author as well.

  • Excellent Behaviors: Assessing Relationships in the Operational Excellence Ecosystem

    Excellent Behaviors: Assessing Relationships in the Operational Excellence Ecosystem

    One of the hot business buzzwords of 2017 is “Operational Excellence.” It has been the subject for many pundits, including this one.
    In October and November we published a two part series, Assuring Operational Excellence from Contractors and Their Subcontractors through BTOES Insights. Each part included a link to additional information.

    The October edition featured an excerpt of our Implementing a Culture of Safety book. In the November edition we released our new best practice solution, Attaining & Sustaining Operational Excellence: A Best Practice Implementation Model. We are proud to make it available herein and in general.

    One of the basic tenets of the RBC Framework is the general construct that Relationships cannot be determined a priori. The well-used example is a man and a woman sitting on a bench at a bus stop. Are they married, siblings, coworkers, friends or simply two people waiting to catch the same/different bus?

    Their relationship cannot be known directly. However, their Behaviors will provide insight into how they relate to each other. Romantic behavior may indicate marriage, dating, an affair etc. They may still be coworkers but most likely are not strangers.

    The third dimension, Conditions (environment) can be considered the stage upon which behaviors play. So, what does this have to do with Operational Excellence?

    Another component of our digital environment is Human Systems Integration (HSI). In our forthcoming book, we have defined HSI as, “Human Systems Integration (HSI) considers the following seven domains: Manpower, Personnel, Training, Human Factors Engineering, Personnel Survivability, Habitability, and Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH). In simple terms, HSI focuses on human beings and their interaction with hardware, software, and the environment.”

    This suggest that our ecosystem is getting more complex and not less. While not usually thought of in these terms, machines have a behavior as well. IBM’s chess playing Watson is a simple example of this phenomena.

    With all of these behavioral dynamics, how can an organization attain and sustain Operational Excellence? If one takes the position that with complex highly interconnected systems things will fail (Perrow’s Normal Accident Theory) then OE is a mythical destination.

    However, with a High Reliability Management (HRM) business model OE cannot only be attained, there is no reason why it cannot be sustained indefinitely. As the name indicates, HRM has a strong focus on reliability or that ability to recover quickly when an event occurs.

    One example is the 2015 Ebola virus incident in Dallas, Texas. One may recall that the virus was brought to the US by a traveler from Africa. Concerns quickly mounted that an epidemic might quickly ensue.

    While a few health care workers were infected, the public health care systems, medical community and others rapidly responded and contained the problem. The system was resilient! Were there problems and lessons learned, absolutely but the system worked. For most of us, life soon returned to normal.

    Conditions may change, but behaviors need to continue to rise to levels of excellence. This is the key to developing strong relationships throughout the ecosystem.

  • Precedent Matters: Physical and Cyber Security Materiality

    Precedent Matters: Physical and Cyber Security Materiality

    Cyber-attacks continue, seemingly unabated. Major industrial incidents seem to remain regardless of efforts to curtail them as well.

    In many cases significant shareholder value is destroyed and perhaps never to be regained. Lives are lost and business models compromised.

    In isolated incidents, senior executives “retire.” Usually, it is business as usual until the next time with the promise not to do it again. However, there is precedent for punishing organizational maleficence.

    Regarding cyber security, the digitalization process underway places the process of managing information technologies into the arena of “core competency.” There are several definitions of the term. Digitalization is the process of using digital technologies as a way of doing everyday business. In other words, this process is material to the well being of the firm.

    While not an attorney nor offering advice, one can observe that in the late 1990s another software issue was so concerning that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued guidance for public companies and others regarding the risk and materiality of exposure to the so-called Y2K date rollover. Most affected firms had significant efforts underway to assure business was not disrupted and/or risk mitigation strategies were put in place.

    Shortly thereafter, the activities of Enron, MCI and others resulted in the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of that act requires firms put in place “management systems” to assure adequate and effective internal controls and transparency regarding financial reporting.

    According to one source approximately $2.5 trillion in value can be unlocked by digitalization for the oil industry ecosystem. However, if cyber security is weak and SCADA and process controls systems are exposed lives may be lost and facilities may be irreparably damaged.

    One view is that today’s Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) organization has greater exposure than any Year 2000 problem may have caused. Shouldn’t society and investors have protections in place equal to Y2K and SOX?

    There is precedent for holding organizational leadership accountable. Digitalization is a Board of Directors agenda item!